MARKET IN TRANSITION
The end of 2011 adhered perfectly to the script, where a little early turbulence exiting Q3 ultimately gave way to calmness and nice gains in Q4. However, it’s safe to say that most of us are glad to have 2011 in the rear view mirror. It was a tough and bloody battle that in the end left us right back where we started. Little was resolved and the markets know it. Debt issues here and abroad, political stubbornness and a global economic slowdown hampered the equity markets for much of the year. Fortunately, U.S. stocks ended the quarter on a positive note as most major indices posted double digit gains for the period. For the quarter, the Rockwood Strategic Equity Fund gained 13.3% vs. 11.8% for the S&P 500 Index. For the year we trailed the benchmark -5.4% vs. 2.1%, which for those familiar with our style, while we never like to do this, it is generally more likely to happen during market transitions like the one that occurred in Q3. International stocks experienced a reprieve of sorts in Q4 as the Morgan Stanley EAFE Index increased 2.9%; however, they were much worse off for the year down 14.8%. Bonds had a more historically normal quarter as the Barclay’s Aggregate Bond Index climbed 1.1% and was up over 7.8% for the year. The Balanced Composite Index gained 4.4%.
The year turned out to be a very challenging one for money managers, as most underperformed their benchmarks, and many by over 5%. This was one of the worst performances in history (according to J.P. Morgan, it was THE worst since 1998). Many believe this is due to the high correlations among stocks, bonds and currencies today, which are even higher than during the financial catastrophe that was 2008. Investors continue to be focused on the three-ring fiscal circus in Washington and the European Sovereign debt crisis. These uncertainties continue to weigh heavily on investors and until there is some resolution on both fronts, the markets are signaling a more defensive posture is in order. This “market transition” or leadership change, began in the second-quarter, went full bore in the third and continued through year-end, as defensive sectors were the place to be for the year, with Utilities, Consumer Staples and Health-care leading the way. Finance and cyclical sectors, such as Materials and Industrials, were the hardest hit. Value stocks outperformed growth and it was better to be invested in large-cap stocks vs. mid-and small-cap.
Evidence of a leadership change continued to evolve during the fourth quarter for both market capitalizations and sector selection. The shift away from more volatile asset classes such as small-cap and emerging market stocks into “safer” blue chip stocks (typically offering higher dividend yields) has become more prevalent. Defense is the name of the game, as Utilities, Consumer Staples and Healthcare are positively trending sectors that have displayed leadership qualities over the last several months. In a market with many uncertainties, investors are clearly enamored with the relative stability and attractive dividends of both sectors. Utilities in particular have surged impressively the last couple months with several groups (electrics, gas, and multi-utilities) producing buys for the portfolio. While these sectors may be boring, they continue to show promise in an uncertain environment. Additionally, the positively rated Healthcare sector rallied in December, and while we want to like this sector, we will tread carefully because true to form, just when you think it’s safe to invest, it begins to get wobbly. Lastly, the holiday season was especially merry for the Consumer Discretionary sector, particularly the upper-end companies. Yet, despite the rally we remain neutral here as signal distribution remains 50/50.
On the negative side; though crude oil continues to rise, energy stocks continue to slide, thus the negative rating for the Energy sector. Particularly negative would be the energy service group, our group focus sell this month. The Financial sector remains firmly entrenched in a long-term decline. While the decline is very late stage there is little evidence that a positive turn is close. In fact, many of the largest and most important institutions have barely halted their recent free-fall. While there has been some improvement within the Industrial sector, it’s not enough to influence a change to our negative rating. Much like the Industrials sector, the highly-cyclical Materials sector got a short-term boost in December, yet the longer-term downtrend remains in place. Also, the Information Technology sector continues to fade; we will use price rallies to reduce exposure to this negative sector. Lastly, while it has been a frustrating market here domestically, things are certainly much worse overseas as our International 100 group continues to get battered – stay defensive!
So, despite the negatives, we believe 2012 should be positive, though the early going could be rough. Corporate earnings in the U.S. are healthy and equity valuations are considered depressed by historical standards. With low expectations for stocks, modest improvement in the economic and political landscape could produce above average gains for the year. As the markets transition, though, the list of “theme” opportunities within sectors such as Consumer Staples, Healthcare, and Utilities, becomes narrower. More than usual, we expect industry and stock selection to be a key ingredient in obtaining above average results for the year. We continue to identify emergent leadership and redeploy investor capital in those companies likely to produce superior returns. We thank you for your continued support, confidence, patience, and most of all, YOUR BUSINESS!

4Q 2011 Fixed Income Commentary
Despite the doom and gloom of 2011, the US economy showed some signs of revival in the later stages of Q4. The most pleasant surprise was the 200,000 increase in jobs revealed in the December employment report. In addition, the unemployment rate dropped to 8.5%. Other measures of economic activity also surprised to the upside. In some ways, however, US economic data has become almost irrelevant, as events in Europe have cast a long shadow over the global economy.
As we approach the two-year anniversary of the Greek debt crisis, the Euro situation appears to be deteriorating. We have been consistently skeptical of the various “solutions” offered by European leaders. This drama has followed a familiar pattern of celebrating the latest plan, enjoying a few months of bliss, and then experiencing panic again when the “plan” fails. Greece’s days in the Euro appear to be numbered as a default seems more and more likely. The next Greek bailout installment is due in March ( €100 billion), and it is difficult to imagine Germany throwing more good money after bad. We expect a very rocky road in Europe, and it is uncertain how tall the resulting tsunami wave will be once it reaches US shores.
We anticipate continued, world-wide central bank quantitative easing (money printing) in 2012. Last September, the Fed launched “Operation Twist,” a plan in which the Fed bought Treasuries in a bid to lower long term interest rates. Fed officials have recently leaked the outline of a new quantitative easing plan, QE3, involving purchases of mortgage backed securities. The Fed is apparently determined to manipulate interest rates, creating distortions in the US economy that policy leaders will be forced to address for years to come.
Given the historically low level of interest rates and world-wide central bank money printing, higher rates are inevitable at some point. However, the situation in Europe has added much uncertainty to the outlook. While we see little value in Treasuries at current yields, we are maintaining a market weight in Treasuries as a hedge against a poor outcome in Europe. We are also neutral from a duration (average maturity) standpoint, overweight credit (US corporate bonds) and underweight mortgage-backed securities. As visibility improves, we plan to redeploy our Treasury position into high yielding sectors. Our duration position will be largely dictated by events in Europe. A positive outcome would most likely lead to higher interest rates, and we would shorten duration to protect our clients’ invested principal. If events in Europe spiral out of control, the demand for Treasuries, as well as their returns, would be great, much as they were in 2011.